Innovation Management in Defensive Organizations

Innovation Management in Defensive Organizations

Interpretive Structural Modeling Of Innovation Ecosystem In Insurance Industry

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Masoud keramati 1
yaghoub enterari 2
Davod Samari 3
Majid Asharafi 4
1 خیابان ازادی - جنب وزارت کار- خیابان وزارت کار نبش خیابان نیایش پلاک 62 معاونت اقتصادی سازمان تامین اجتماعی طبقه سوم
2 Associate Professor Research Institute of Higher Education Planning, Tehran, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics and Management, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran
4 Assistant Professor, Accounting Department, Aliabad Katoul Branch, Islamic Azad University, Aliabad Katoul, Iran
10.22034/qjimdo.2021.226797.1294
Abstract
Background & Purpose: Innovation ecosystem is a network of communications and interactions among actors who, in collaboration with and sharing knowledge, technology, skills and resources, enhance their ability around an innovation. Considering the importance of understanding this issue, this research seeks to interpretive structural modeling of innovation ecosystem in insurance industry.
Methodology: This research is exploratory in terms of purpose and In terms of type of use, it is an applied research and qualitative method based on interpretive paradigm has been used. Theoretical foundations were used to identify the factors affecting the innovation ecosystem, in the next step after the formation of structural self-interaction matrix, the research data were collected by referring to 30 experts and analyzed using Mick Mac software.
Findings: Based on the dimensions of "guiding power" and "dependency", "creating good governance" as a governance umbrella and macro leadership, "university-industry-insurance link" as trans-organizational interactions, "strengthening marketing and competition in the market with a focus on insurance services" and "developing the platforms and substructures of the insurance industry" are at the eighth level as key independent variables such as the foundation stone of the model.
Conclusion: In order to create and develop the innovation ecosystem, policy makers and managers of the insurance industry should prioritize the dimensions of the eighth level (good governance, university-industry-insurance link, strengthening marketing and competition in the market and developing the substructures of the insurance industry).
Keywords
Innovation Ecosystem
Insurance Industry
Model
Interpretive Structural Modeling
پورصادق، ناصر.(1397). شناسایی و اولویت‌بندی عوامل مؤثر بر نوآوری باز در صنعت بیمه (مطالعۀ موردی: یک شرکت بیمه‌ای). پژوهشنامه بیمه، دوره 33(2)، 84-65.
صحت، سعید؛ مظلومی، نادر؛ فخیمی محمدپور، حمید.(1394). رابطۀ بین نوآوری سازمانی و مزیت رقابتی در شرکت‌های بیمه. پژوهشنامۀ بیمه،30(2).
طباطباییان، سید حبیب‌الله؛ طهوری، حمیدرضا؛ تقوا، محمدرضا؛ تقوی فرد، محمدتقی.(1397). تحلیل اکوسیستم نوآوری داروهای زیستی در ایران. فصلنامه مدیریت توسعه فناوری، 5(4)، 45-9.
عربیون، ابوالقاسم؛ شایع ثانی، محمدمهدی؛ آفتابی، مرتضی؛ کافی موسوی، مرجان.(1395). شناخت و تأثیر اکوسیستم نوآوری در گردشگری. اجلاس بین‌المللی ایده‌های نوین در مدیریت، اقتصاد و حسابداری. بارسلونای اسپانیا، مهرماه 95
قادری، پریسا.(1395). سومین اجلاس ملی نظام‌های اطلاعاتی، دانشگاه تهران.
کشتکار هرانکی، مهران.(1395). طراحی الگوی راهبردی نوآوری اجتماعی در جمهوری اسلامی ایران. رساله دکتری، دانشگاه عالی دفاع ملی.
گروه محققان بانک جهانی.(1393). سیاست‌گذاری نوآوری در عصر جهانی‌شدن؛ راهنمایی برای کشورهای درحال‌توسعه. ترجمه هادی زارع، تهران، مرکز ملی جهانی‌شدن، چاپ اول.
محمدی، اکبر؛ صدقیانی، مهدی؛ یداللهی، میلا؛ البدوی، امیر.(1397). شناسایی بازیگران کلیدی در توسعه اکوسیستم نوآوری صنعت پایین‌دست پتروشیمی ایران. فصلنامه رشد فن‌آوری، 4(54)، 36-45.
محمودی، میمند؛ مظلومی، نادر؛ وجدانی، فؤاد.(1394). عوامل مؤثر بر نوآوری در صنعت بیمه کشور. پژوهشنامه بیمه، دوره 30(1)،94-53.
Alawamleh, M and Popplewell, K. (2011). Interpretive Structural Modelling of Risk Sources in a Virtual Organisation. International Journal of Production Research, 49(20), 6041-6063.
Agarwal, A, Shankar, R and Tiwari, M K.(2007). Modeling Agility of Supply Chain. Industrial marketing management, 36(4), 443-457.
Cohen, D. (2006). Trois Leçons Sur La Société Post-Industrielle. Paris: Seuil.
Fuerlinger, G. Fandl, U and Funke,T.(2015). The Role of the State in the Entrepreneurship Ecosystem: insights from Germany. Triple Helix, 2(1), 1-26.
Gault, F. (2018). Defining and Measuring Innovation in all Sectors of the Economy. Research policy, 47(3), 617-622.‌
Gobble, M M. (2014). Charting the Innovation Ecosystem. Research-Technology Management, 57(4), 55-59.‌
Gopalakrishnan, S and Damanpour, F.(1992). Innovation Research in Economics, Sociology, and Technology Management: a review and synthesis. Proceedings of the Academy of Management, 52, 488.‌
Granstrand, O and Holgersson, M. (2020). Innovation Ecosystems: A Conceptual Review and a New Definition. Technovation, 90, 102098.
Greenberg, J and Baron, R A.(2000). Behavior in Organizations. Prentice Hall. Inc.
Hwang, V W and Horowitt, G.(2012). The rainforest: The Secret to Building the Next Silicon Valley.
Isenberg, D.(2011). The Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Strategy as a New Paradigm for Economy Policy: Principles for Cultivating Entrepreneurship. Babson Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Project, Babson College, Babson Park: MA.
Isenberg, D. (2013). Worthless, Impossible and Stupid: How Contrarian Entrepreneurs Create and Capture Extraordinary Value. Harvard Business Review Press.
Katz, B and Wagner, J. (2014). The Rise of Urban Innovation Districts. Harv. Bus. Rev.
Kayal, A A. (2008). National Innovation Systems a Proposed Framework for Developing Countries. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 8(1), 74-86.
Koskela-Huotari, Kaisa, Bo Edvardsson, Julia M. Jonas, David Sörhammar and Lars Witell. (2016). Innovation in Service Ecosystems—Breaking, Making, and Maintaining Institutionalized Rules of Resource Integration. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 2964-2971.
Lin, C Y Y and Chen, M. Y. C. (2007). Does Innovation Lead to Performance? An Empirical Study of SMEs in Taiwan. Management Research News.
Mazzucato, M and Robinson, D K. (2018). Co-creating and Directing Innovation Ecosystems? NASA's Changing Approach to Public-Private Partnerships in Low-Earth orbit. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 166-177.
Neck, H M, Meyer, G D, Cohen, B and Corbett, A C. (2004). An Entrepreneurial System View of New Venture Creation. Journal of Small Business Management, 42(2), 190-208.
Oh, D S, Phillips, F, Park, S and Lee, E. (2016). Innovation Ecosystems: A Critical Examination. Technovation, 54, 1-6.
Rabelo, R J and Bernus, P.(2015). A Holistic Model of Building Innovation Ecosystems. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 48(3), 2250-2257.
Ravi, V, Shankar, R and Tiwari, M. K. (2005). Analyzing Alternatives in Reverse logistics for end-of-life computers: ANP and Balanced Scorecard Approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 48(2), 327-356.
Rao, B and Jimenez, B.(2011). A Comparative Analysis of Digital Innovation Ecosystems. In 2011 Proceedings of PICMET'11: Technology Management in the Energy Smart World (PICMET) (pp. 1-12). IEEE.
Roberts, E B and Eesley, C E. (2011). Entrepreneurial Impact: The Role of MIT--an Updated Report. Now Publishers Inc.
Smorodinskaya, N, Russell, M, Katukov, D and Still, K.(2017). Innovation Ecosystems vs. Innovation Systems in Terms of Collaboration and co-Creation of Value. In Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
Urabe, K. (1988). Innovation and the Japanese Management System. Innovation and Management International Comparisons, Walter de Gruyter.
Vargo, S L and Lusch, R F.(2016). Institutions and Axioms: an Extension and Update of Service-Dominant logic. Journal of the Academy of marketing Science, 44(1), 5-23.
Xiaoren, Z, Ling, D and Xiangdong, C. (2014). Interaction of Open Innovation and Business Ecosystem. International Journal of u-and e-Service, Science and Technology, 7(1), 51-64.