تاثیر اقدامات منابع انسانی با عملکرد بالا بر دوسوتوانی سازمانی: تبیین نقش میانجی دوسوتوانی رفتاری و نقش تعدیل‌گر پشتیبانی مدیریت

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار، گروه مدیریت منابع انسانی و کسب و کار، دانشکده مدیریت دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران.

2 کارشناس ارشد کارآفرینی، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

زمینه و هدف: هدف این پژوهش تبیین نقش اقدامات مدیریت منابع انسانی با عملکرد بالا در دوسوتوانی سازمانی با تاکید بر نقش میانجی دوسوتوانی رفتاری و نقش تعدیل­گر پشتیبانی مدیریت است.
روش‌: این پژوهش از لحاظ هدف، کاربردی و از لحاظ روش گردآوری داده­ها پژوهشی توصیفی همبستگی است. جامعه آماری این پژوهش شامل 90 شرکت فعال در صنایع غذایی در تهران بود که در آن از سه پرسشنامة استاندارد مقیاس اقدامات منابع انسانی، مقیاس دوسوتوانی سازمانی، مقیاس دوسوتوانی رفتاری و مقیاس پشتیبانی مدیریت استفاده شد. برای تحلیل داده‌ها از مدل معادلات ساختاری به روش حداقل مربعات جزئی استفاده گردید.
یافته‌ها: نتایج پژوهش نشان داد که اقدامات مدیریت منابع انسانی با عملکرد بالا بر دوسوتوانی رفتاری و دوسوتوانی سازمانی تأثیر مثبت و معنادار دارد. به علاوه، دوسوتوانی رفتاری نقش میانجی در رابطه بین اقدامات مدیریت منابع انسانی با عملکرد بالا و دوسوتوانی سازمانی داشت. همچنین، پشتیبانی مدیریت تاثیر مثبت و مستقیم بر دوسوتوانی رفتاری داشت و در رابطه بین اقدامات مدیریت منابع انسانی با عملکرد بالا و دوسوتوانی رفتاری نقش تعدیل­گر نداشت.
نتیجه‌گیری: با تقویت مدیریت منابع انسانی با عملکرد بالا می‌توان به ارتقای دوسوتوانی کمک نموده و از مزایای حاصل از ابتکار و نوآوری بهره برد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


Adler, P. S., Goldoftas, B., & Levine, D. I. (1999). Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study model of changeovers in the Toyota production system, Organization Science, Vol.10, Issue.1, PP. 43–68.
Andriopoulos, C. & Lewis, M.W. (2009). Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation, Organization Science, Vol. 20, No. 4, PP. 696–717.
Baldwin, T.T & Ford, J.K. (1988). Transfer of training: A review and directions for future research, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 41, Issue.1, PP. 63-105.
Barney, J. (1991), Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, Vol. 17, No.1, PP. 99–120.
Bledow, R., Frese, M., Anderson, N.R., Erez, M., & Farr, J.L. (2009). A dialectic perspective on innovation: Conflicting demands, multiple pathways, and ambidexterity, Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, Vol. 2, Issue. 3, PP. 305–337.
Cabrera, A., Collins, W. C., & Salgado, J. F. (2006). Determinants of individual engagement in knowledge sharing, International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 17, Issue. 2, PP. 245–264.
Chang, Y. Y. (2015). A multilevel examination of high-performance work systems and unit-level organisational ambidexterity, Human Resource Management Journal, Vol. 25, Issue.­1, PP. 79-101.
Chang, Y. Y., & Hughes, M. (2012). Drivers of innovation ambidexterity in small-to medium-sized firms, European Management Journal, Vol. 30, Issue.­1, PP. 1-17.
Cheung, C. & Law, R. (1998). Hospitality service quality and the role of performance appraisal, Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, Vol. 8, Issue. 6, PP.402-406.
Collins, C. J., & Smith, K. G. (2006). Knowledge exchange and combination: The role of human resource practices in the performance of high-technology firms, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 49, No. 3, PP. 44–60.
Davies, A. (2001). What silence knows e planning, public participation and environmental values, Environmental Values, Vol. 10, No. 1, PP. 77-102.
 Dunford, B.,  Snell S.A.,  Wright, P. (2001). Human resources and the resource based view of the firm, Journal of Management, Vol. 27, Issues. 6, PP. 701–721.
Fiorito, J., Bozeman, D., Young, A., & Meurs, J. (2007). Organizational commitment, human resource practices, and organizational characteristics, Journal of Managerial Issues, Vol. 19, No. 2, PP.186-207.
García, M. U, Cortés, E. C, Lajara, B. M. & Sáez, P.Z. (2016). Toward Organizational Ambidexterity in the Hotel Industry: The Role of Human, Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, Vol. 57, No. 4, PP. 367–378.
Gibson, C.B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity, Academy of Management Journal, Vol .47, No.2, pp. 209-226.
Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G., & Shalley, C. E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 49, No. 4, PP. 693-706.
Hayton, J. C. (2005). Promoting corporate entrepreneurship through human resource management: A review of empirical research, Human Resource Management Review, Vol. 15, Issue. 1, PP. 21–41.
Hornsby, J. S., Kuratko, D. F., Shepherd, D. A., & Bott, J. P. (2009). Managers’ corporate entrepreneurial actions: Examining perception and position, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 24, Issue. 3, PP. 236–247.
Kang, S., Morris, S., & Snell, S. (2007). Relational archetypes, organizational learning, and value creation: Extending the human resource architecture, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32, No. 1, PP. 236–256.
Kang, S.-C., & Snell, S.A., (2009). Intellectual capital architectures and ambidextrous learning: A framework for human resource management, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 46, No.1, PP. 65-92.
Kang, S.-C., Snell, S.A., & Swart, J., (2012). Options-based HRM, intellectual capital, and exploratory and exploitative learning in law firms’ practice groups, Human Resource Management, Vol. 51, No. 4, PP. 461-485.
Kase, R., Paauwe, J., & Zupan, N. (2009). HR practices, interpersonal relations, and intrafirm knowledge transfer in knowledge-intensive firms: A social network perspective, Human Resource Management, Vol. 48, Issue. 4, PP. 615–639.
Kuratko, D. F., Ireland, R. D., Covin, J. G., & Hornsby, J. S. (2005). A model of middle-level managers’ entrepreneurial behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 29, issue. 6, PP. 699–716.
Lee, H., & Choi, B. (2003). Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance: An integrative view and empirical examination, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 20, Issue. 1, PP. 179–228.
Lepak, D. P., Takeuchi, R., & Snell, S. (2003). Employment flexibility and firm performance: Examining the interaction effects of employment mode, environmental dynamism, and technological intensity, Journal of Management, Vol. 29, issue. 5, PP. 681-703.
Lubatkin, M. H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., & Veiga, J. F. (­2006). Ambidexterity and performance in small- to mediumsized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration, Journal of Management, Vol. 32, Issue. 5, PP. 646-672.
Mom, T. J., Van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volverda, H. W. (2007). Investigating managers’ exploration and exploitation activities: The influence of top-down, bottom-up, and horizontal knowledge in flows, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 44, Issue. 6, PP. 910–931.
Mom, T. J., van den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2009). Understanding variation in managers’ ambidexterity: Investigating direct and interaction effects of formal structural and personal coordination mechanisms, Organization Science, Vol. 20, No. 4, PP. 812-828.
Mondy, R. W. & Noe, R. M. (2005). Human resource management. (9th Ed.). New Jersey: Pearson.
Morris, M. H., & Jones, F. (1993). Human resource management and corporate entrepreneurship: An empirical assessment. International Journal of Human Resources Management, Vol. 4, Issue. 4, PP. 873–896.
Nosella, A., Cantarello, S., & Filippini, R. (2012). The intellectual structure of organizational ambidexterity: A bibliographic investigation into the state of the art, Strategic Organization, Vol. 10, Issue. 4, PP. 450–465.
O’Reilly, C.A. and Tushman, M.L. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: past, present, and future, The Academy of Management Perspectives, Vol. 27, No. 4, PP. 324-338.
O'Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a Dynamic Capability: Resolving the Innovator's Dilemma, Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 28, PP. 185-206.
Pastor, I. P, & Perez, V.M. (2014). Does HRM generate ambidextrous employees for ambidextrous learning? The moderating role of management support, International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 26, Issue. 5, PP. 2452-2467.
Patel, P. C., Messersmith, J. G., & Lepak, D. P. (2013). Walking the tightrope: An assessment of the relationship between highperformance work systems and organizational ambidexterity, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 56, No. 5, PP. 1420-1442.
Prieto, I. M., & Santana, M. P. (2012). Building ambidexterity: The role of human resource practices in the performance of firms from Spain, Human Resource Management, Vol.51, Issue. 2, PP. 189–212.
Raisch, S., & Birkinshaw, J., (2008). Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators, Journal of management, Vol. 34, No. 3, PP. 375-409.
Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., & Tushman, M. L. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization Science,Vol. 20, No. 4, PP. 685-695.
Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 87, No. 4, PP. 698–714.
Shrivastava, A., Bartol, K. M., & Locke, E. A. (2006). Empowering leadership in management teams: Effects on knowledge sharing, efficacy, and performance, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 49, No. 6, PP. 1239–1251.
Simsek, Z., Heavey, C., Veiga, J. F., & Souder, D. (2009). A typology for aligning organizational ambidexterity’s conceptualizations, antecedents, and outcomes, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 46, Issue. 5, PP. 864–894.
Smith, W. K., & Tushman, M. L. (2005). Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams, Organization Science, Vol. 16, No. 5, PP. 522–536.
Snell, S. A, & Dean, J.W. (1992). Integrated Manufacturing and Human Resource Management: A Human Capital Perspective, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 35, No. 3, PP. 467-504.
Swart, J., & Kinnie, N. (2010). Organizational learning, knowledge assets and HR practices in professional service firms,Human Resource Management Journal, Vol. 20, Issue. 1, PP. 64-79.